Nonverbal IQ battery now supported

AI reports for nonverbal cognitive assessments

Generate IEP-ready narrative reports and publication-ready data visualizations for WNV, TONI-4, and CTONI-2 in minutes.

Designed specifically for the students standard verbal measures miss.

ELL students Deaf / Hard of Hearing Speech-language impaired Motor-impaired students
Try Free → View all assessments →

WNV Composite Profile

Auto-generated
Full Scale IQ
99
Matrices
102
Coding
91
Spatial Span
95
Picture Arrngmt
105
Dashed line = population mean (100) · Standard Score scale (M=100, SD=15)
Results indicate overall nonverbal reasoning abilities within the Average range (FSIQ = 99, 47th percentile). A notable strength emerged in Picture Arrangement (SS = 105) relative to Coding (SS = 91), suggesting stronger sequential/social reasoning compared to processing speed. This profile is consistent with the student's ELL background and supports the use of nonverbal measures as the primary index of cognitive ability.

The nonverbal battery

Supported assessments

Sped.AI supports the three primary nonverbal cognitive instruments. Each page generates a complete report with AI narrative, composite + subtest scoring, and all three chart types.

WNV Live

Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability

Ages 4:0–21:11. Entirely nonverbal administration using only gestures and demonstration. Full Scale IQ + 6 subtests. Ideal for ELL students, students with speech/language disorders, and culturally diverse populations requiring language-free cognitive measurement.

Generate report →
CTONI-2 Live

Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, 2nd ed.

Ages 6:0–89:11. Nonverbal, motor-free. Three composites: Full Scale Nonverbal IQ (FSNIQ), Pictorial (PNIQ), and Geometric (GNIQ). Six subtests assess analogical, categorical, and sequential reasoning. Separates concrete (pictorial) from abstract (geometric) nonverbal reasoning.

Generate report →
TONI-4 Coming Soon

Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, 4th ed.

Ages 6:0–89:11. Language-free, motor-reduced measure of general intelligence via abstract/figural problem-solving. Entirely pantomimed administration — examinee points to answer from multiple-choice options. Single Index score (M=100, SD=15) plus percentile, CI, and classification.

Arriving soon →

Why Sped.AI

Built for nonverbal evaluation workflows

Nonverbal assessments produce rich multi-axis data. Sped.AI turns that data into complete reports with visualizations that make your profile patterns instantly legible.

📊

3 chart types for nonverbal profiles

Bar charts for composite comparisons, radar charts for multi-axis profiles (especially useful for CTONI-2's pictorial vs. geometric gap), and line profiles for subtest scatter. Nonverbal profiles are visual by nature — your charts should be too.

🧠

Population-appropriate interpretive language

AI narratives contextualize results for ELL, deaf/HOH, speech-language, and motor-impaired populations. Includes appropriate accommodation rationale and explains why the nonverbal battery was the appropriate measure for this student.

🛡

No competitor offers this

ClickReport and PAR AI produce text-only reports. No tool on the market generates AI-written narrative reports + publication-ready charts for the nonverbal battery. Sped.AI is the first to combine both.

📝

Full narrative with evidence-based recommendations

5–6 population-specific recommendations tied directly to score profile. Visual-spatial strategy suggestions, accommodations for verbally-loaded instruction, and IEP goal alignment for each area of strength/weakness.

Chart types included with every nonverbal report

Bar
108
Radar
Line

Bar (composite comparison) · Radar (multi-axis profile) · Line (subtest scatter)

CTONI-2 Assessment Report

Sample
Student
M.T.
DOB
03/14/2016
Age
9:8
Composite SS PR Classification
Full Scale Nonverbal IQ (FSNIQ) 95 37 Average
Pictorial Nonverbal IQ (PNIQ) 101 53 Average
Geometric Nonverbal IQ (GNIQ) 89 23 Low Average
Interpretation: M.T.'s Full Scale Nonverbal IQ falls within the Average range (SS = 95, 37th percentile). The 12-point gap between Pictorial reasoning (SS = 101) and Geometric reasoning (SS = 89) is statistically notable and clinically relevant, suggesting stronger concrete/familiar problem-solving compared to abstract spatial reasoning. Given M.T.'s status as an English language learner, this nonverbal profile provides a culturally responsive measure of cognitive ability unconfounded by language proficiency. Educational recommendations emphasize visual-spatial support strategies and concrete manipulative approaches to abstract math concepts.

See it in action

Full report, generated in under 60 seconds

Enter composite and subtest scores, pick your preferred chart layout, and get a complete IEP-ready report with interpretation, recommendations, and FERPA-compliant student header.

Try CTONI-2 Report → Try WNV Report →

5 free reports · No credit card required

Pricing

Simple, transparent pricing

All nonverbal assessment reports are included on the Pro plan. No per-report fees, no surprises.

Free
$0 /mo

Get started with 5 free reports.

  • 5 free reports (all types)
  • WISC-V, WIAT-4 included
  • All chart types
  • PDF export
Start Free
Pro
$29 /mo

Unlimited reports for solo practitioners.

  • Unlimited all 25 assessments
  • WNV, TONI-4, CTONI-2 included
  • All 3 chart types
  • PDF + Word export
  • Priority generation speed
Get Pro
Team
$79 /mo

For practices and school psychology teams.

  • Everything in Pro
  • Up to 5 team members
  • Shared report history
  • Admin dashboard
  • Priority support
Contact Us

All plans include FERPA-compliant data handling · No student PII stored long-term · FERPA compliance details →

FAQ

Common questions about nonverbal assessments

Specific to how Sped.AI handles nonverbal cognitive evaluations.

Can I use this for bilingual/ELL students? +
Yes, absolutely. WNV, CTONI-2, and TONI-4 are all designed for ELL and culturally diverse populations — Sped.AI generates reports specifically contextualized for these students. The narrative explains why a nonverbal measure was the appropriate selection given the student's language background, and frames the results appropriately. ELL status should be documented in the referral history regardless of the assessment instrument used.
Does it support deaf/Hard-of-Hearing evaluations? +
Yes. All three instruments in the nonverbal battery are appropriate for deaf/HOH students: WNV uses entirely pantomimed/gestural administration, CTONI-2 uses nonverbal (pantomimed or written) instructions with pointing responses, and TONI-4 uses gesture-only administration. Sped.AI generates reports with population-appropriate framing that contextualizes the results appropriately for deaf/HOH examinees and notes the significance of the nonverbal administration format in the narrative.
What makes Sped.AI different from ClickReport or PAR for nonverbal assessments? +
Two things no competitor offers: (1) Auto-generated data visualizations — bar charts, radar profiles, and line scatters are produced automatically from your score data. Nonverbal profiles are inherently visual, and these charts make discrepancy patterns (like the CTONI-2 pictorial vs. geometric gap) immediately clear to IEP teams and parents. (2) AI narrative written specifically for nonverbal populations — our reports contextualize results for ELL, deaf/HOH, speech-language, and motor-impaired students rather than treating nonverbal assessment as a generic cognitive battery.
Can I combine nonverbal + cognitive batteries in one report? +
Not in a single report today. Each Sped.AI assessment generates a separate report for a single instrument. However, you can run WNV, TONI-4, or CTONI-2 alongside WISC-V, KABC-II, or DAS-II — and the AI narratives reference discrepancies when both assessments are entered within the same evaluation cycle. For example, if you run both WNV and WISC-V for a bilingual student, the WNV report notes the context and the WISC-V report frames its results relative to the nonverbal baseline. Running multiple assessments in the same evaluation is the standard of care for ELL and deaf/HOH students.
How do I decide between WNV, CTONI-2, and TONI-4? +
WNV is best for younger children (ages 4–21:11) and when you need subtest-level profile data alongside a composite. CTONI-2 is best when you need to differentiate pictorial (concrete) from geometric (abstract) reasoning — particularly valuable for students where the nature of the nonverbal deficit matters (e.g., deaf students may show different patterns on pictorial vs. geometric). TONI-4 (coming soon) is best for a quick, single-score measure when speed of administration is critical and you don't need subtest breakdown. All three are appropriate for ELL, deaf/HOH, and speech-language populations.

Stop spending hours on nonverbal reports.

Generate complete, evidence-based IEP-ready reports for your nonverbal battery students in minutes, not hours.

Try Free — 5 Reports →

No credit card · FERPA compliant · Works on any device